Capital Markets & GovernanceFeatured

Taiwan’s Increasing Income Polarization: Global Pay and Local Pay

Share this article
LINEFacebook

Robin’s commentary

Storage information

Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.

Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above

English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2025-09-23. Translated 2026-10-30 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文

Reading guide

Robin argues that income polarization in Taiwan will become increasingly pronounced. In the future, 50–70% of people may pay no income tax, while the top 30%, or even the top 5% or 10%, could support the entire income-tax contribution. Fewer taxpayers would not necessarily mean declining revenue: the top 30% remain on a high-growth trajectory, earning more and therefore paying more. Even as taxpayer numbers shrink, collections can exceed government budget estimates, with most of the contribution coming from a small group at the top. The post gives this distribution: 0.13% of people pay 17.47% of income tax; 0.85% pay 41.19%; 2.79% pay 60.75%; and 7.66% pay 77.21%. A small group, around 10% of Taiwan’s population, benefits from globalization, AI development, and U.S.–China confrontation. They earn “Global Pay” and can expect further income growth. A much larger group earns “Local Pay,” primarily in domestic services or traditional industries competing intensely with China. Their income growth may be limited, stagnant, or even persistently negative. As high earners drive inflation and increases in goods and housing prices, Robin argues that government needs tax and subsidy measures to support disadvantaged groups left behind by globalization and AI. They may feel disconnected from the past decade’s economic growth while experiencing its inflation keenly, creating a sense of relative deprivation.

Key points

  • The post states that 0.13% of people pay 17.47% of income tax, while 7.66% pay 77.21%.
  • Around 10% of the population earns Global Pay and remains on a high-growth trajectory.
  • Local Pay in domestic services and traditional industries competing with China may continue to shrink.
  • Feeling excluded from growth while directly experiencing inflation creates relative deprivation.
Columns and beams in an open building are connected by central rods and balanced weights, suggesting structure and checks in governance.
Capital markets & governanceThematic illustration · AI generated

Full text — English translation

Income polarization in Taiwan will become increasingly pronounced. In the future, 50–70% of people in Taiwan will pay no income tax. The top 30%, or even the top 5% or 10%, could support the entire income-tax contribution. Revenue will not decline simply because only 10–30% of people pay tax: the top 30% remain on a high-growth trajectory and may earn more and more in the future, naturally paying more tax as well. Even if the number of taxpayers falls, collections can still exceed the government’s budget estimates, as they have in recent years. Most of the contribution comes from this small group at the top. 0.13% of people pay 17.47% of Taiwan’s income tax. 0.85% of people pay 41.19% of Taiwan’s income tax. 2.79% of people pay 60.75% of Taiwan’s income tax. 7.66% of people pay 77.21% of Taiwan’s income tax. A small group in Taiwan—around 10% of the population—is on a high-growth trajectory amid globalization, AI development, and U.S.–China confrontation. Their income is Global Pay. Because they remain on that trajectory, they can be expected to earn more and more. But a much larger group in Taiwan earns Local Pay, mainly in domestic service industries or traditional industries competing intensely with China. Their income growth may be limited, stagnant, or even persistently negative. High earners drive inflation and increases in goods and housing prices. Government therefore needs tax and subsidy measures to support disadvantaged groups that have not kept pace with globalization and AI. They may feel that the past decade’s economic growth has had nothing to do with them, yet keenly experience the inflation accompanying it, creating a sense of relative deprivation.

These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.

Share this article
LINEFacebook

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.

Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.

0 / 2000

Comments load when you reach this section.

    Administrator sign-in

    My reading notes

    These notes stay in this browser and are not published. Writing a note also saves the article. Back up or move your notes in My Reading.

    Manage my bookmarks and notes →

    STAY CURIOUS

    Save a good question for your next visit.

    Save this article, or follow the Facebook page and RSS feed for additions. Historical articles retain their original publication dates.

    Browse All articlesSearch articles and full text →