Trends & Emerging Technology

Skills for the AI Era: Native-Language Fluency, Expression, and Thought Matter More Fundamentally Than Foreign-Language Ability

Share this article
LINEFacebook

Robin’s retelling and reflections (a startup CEO’s views; May 2026)

Storage information

Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.

Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above

English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2026-05-05. Translated 2026-10-31 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文

Reading guide

Robin recounts a conversation with a startup CEO. AI may provide a certain level of translation and communication in the future, but people still need very strong command of at least one language to think deeply, analyze, organize, ask AI questions, and express themselves clearly. The CEO believes that after thirty years of science and engineering overshadowing the humanities, AI’s ability to perform basic logical operations will shift human value back toward feeling, understanding, imagination, and empathy. He sees a future for humanities graduates. The Industrial Revolution freed human physical labor; AI will free mental labor, requiring society’s underlying operating logic to be rebuilt. This is a retelling of a conversation, not a statistical or research finding.

Key points

  • Retold view: AI can translate to a certain standard, but people still need fluency in at least one language.
  • Retold view: AI excels at basic logical operations; human value lies more in feeling, empathy, and imagination.
  • The Industrial Revolution freed physical labor; AI will free mental labor.
  • A retold conversation and personal reflections, not research conclusions; as of May 2026.
A magnifying lens examines layered signals and data textures, suggesting technological exploration and judgment.
Trends & technologyThematic illustration · AI generated

Full text — English translation

Command of your native language matters more. We all want to strengthen our children’s foreign-language abilities. Yesterday, I spoke with a startup CEO who had studied in the United States from a young age. He believes AI will provide a certain level of translation and effective communication in the future. But he thinks people must be very fluent in at least one language: able to think deeply, analyze, organize, synthesize, explore, exchange questions and answers with AI, express their ideas clearly, and communicate effectively with others—for example, through fluent writing and clear, logical expression. He also believes the future belongs to humanities graduates. Science and engineering have thoroughly overshadowed the humanities for the past thirty years. In the future, however, AI will perform basic logical operations and similar tasks better than humans. The AI era should bring us back to human nature and human value, which may instead highlight the strengths of the humanities: feeling, understanding, and imagining. The future calls for people who can connect emotionally with others, show empathy, use their imagination, and observe, understand, and empathize well… In the Industrial Revolution, humans used machines to free physical labor on a comprehensive scale. In the coming AI era, we will use AI to free mental labor on a comprehensive scale. Society’s underlying operating logic will need to be reconstructed and renewed. What needs to be valued and cultivated will also be completely different. The future may involve more exploration and inspiration concerning our humanity and spirituality. Anyone with children worries about the challenges they will face and the abilities they will need to navigate a rapidly changing future with confidence.

These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.

Share this article
LINEFacebook

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.

Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.

0 / 2000

Comments load when you reach this section.

    Administrator sign-in

    My reading notes

    These notes stay in this browser and are not published. Writing a note also saves the article. Back up or move your notes in My Reading.

    Manage my bookmarks and notes →

    STAY CURIOUS

    Save a good question for your next visit.

    Save this article, or follow the Facebook page and RSS feed for additions. Historical articles retain their original publication dates.

    Browse All articlesSearch articles and full text →