Entrepreneurship & Strategy

Seven Reflections After FITI Reviews: Pool Resources, Clarify the Endgame, Stay Asset-Light, and Find Real Demand

Share this article
LINEFacebook

Robin’s reflections (as of October 2021; program names and eligibility refer to that time)

Storage information

Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.

Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above

English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2021-10-18. Translated 2026-10-31 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文

Reading guide

After completing his FITI reviews, Robin shares seven points: similar teams can join forces to compete internationally; use national resources such as Ministry of Science and Technology and Ministry of Economic Affairs programs and the National Development Fund’s angel investment program; decide whether the endgame is acquisition or an IPO; making a product or obtaining certification is not the ultimate test—selling it worldwide is. A customer saying “sounds good; we’ll evaluate it once it’s built” is usually negative; someone with real demand wants to pay before completion. Professor-led student startups should include someone who has run a business, and R&D startups should stay asset-light and outsource where possible.

Key points

  • Similar startup teams can pool resources rather than duplicate effort.
  • Use public programs and funds; achieve results before leaving university to establish a company.
  • Clarify the endgame—acquisition or IPO—because the planning differs.
  • “We’ll evaluate it once it’s built” is usually negative; real demand means wanting to buy before it exists.
  • R&D startups should stay asset-light and focus on what matters most.
One clear path continues into the distance among several branching routes, suggesting choice and focus.
Entrepreneurship & strategyThematic illustration · AI generated

Full text — English translation

I have finally finished writing this round of FITI reviews. Here are a few thoughts. 1. If startup teams in Taiwan are trying to solve similar problems or achieve similar goals, could they join forces? Rather than wasting resources on duplication on this small island, organize complementary strengths and compete internationally. 2. Make greater use of national resources for early-stage development, including Ministry of Science and Technology programs—FITI, Meng-Ya, Ba-Jian, and TTA—Ministry of Economic Affairs industrial technology development programs, and the National Development Fund’s angel investment program. 2-1. If you have not yet established a company, consider staying at university while your professor applies for the Ministry of Science and Technology’s Meng-Ya or Ba-Jian programs. Build substantial results and data before leaving university to start the company. 3. The team should clarify why it is starting a business and what endgame it wants: acquisition or an IPO. If acquisition is the goal, seek opportunities early to talk with major companies and understand what conditions would make them likely to acquire you. Aiming directly for an IPO may require different planning and management. 4. Building the product, or even obtaining certification (for example, from the FDA), is not necessarily the ultimate test. What ultimately matters is whether you can actually sell the product around the world. 5. Conduct more interviews with target customers to understand demand. But if someone says the idea sounds good, suggests you try building it, and says they will evaluate adopting it once it is ready, that response is usually not positive—it is very negative. Customers with real demand cannot wait to pay, even before your product exists or while it is still imperfect. 6. Even with unique technology—perhaps world-leading?—you still need people who can run the company. What currently concerns me is professors asking students aged 22–26 to start businesses: there will certainly be many pitfalls ahead, large and small. Ideally, the team should include someone who has actually run a business. 7. R&D startups should operate as asset-light as possible at first. Do not try to do everything yourselves, from R&D through production. Production, quality control, and yield in particular have many pitfalls. Outsource wherever possible and concentrate resources on the most essential work, rather than trying to expand in every direction at once.

These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.

Share this article
LINEFacebook

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.

Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.

0 / 2000

Comments load when you reach this section.

    Administrator sign-in

    My reading notes

    These notes stay in this browser and are not published. Writing a note also saves the article. Back up or move your notes in My Reading.

    Manage my bookmarks and notes →

    STAY CURIOUS

    Save a good question for your next visit.

    Save this article, or follow the Facebook page and RSS feed for additions. Historical articles retain their original publication dates.

    Browse All articlesSearch articles and full text →