Generosity in Sharing, Wisdom in Allocating: Rewards Are Not Incentives
Storage information
Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.
Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above
English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2021-10-15. Translated 2026-10-30 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文
Reading guide
Before discussing equity incentives, one distinction must be clear: incentives are primarily about encouraging future value creation, not recognizing past contributions. Recognition of past contributions is a reward; the two must not be confused. Many companies allocate shares by employees’ current tenure and positions, only to achieve the opposite of what they intended. Everyone feels they are the most capable person in the department, have contributed the most, or have served the longest. The allocation leaves everyone dissatisfied and unconvinced of others’ entitlement, intensifying internal conflict instead of motivating people. Worse, recipients may regard the shares as something they were owed all along: withholding them was a debt, so returning them deserves no thanks. For the founder, it becomes a double loss. Authority has been delegated, equity distributed, and benefits shared, yet the internal climate changes. Rules are the surface; human nature is the foundation. Using the logic of equity rewards to design equity incentives often marks the turning point toward a company’s decline. The right approach is a plan suited to the business’s own development, rather than a rigidly copied template. A mechanism focused on the future, shared benefits, and shared risks can unite founders, senior managers, and frontline employees in expanding the value of the business together.
Key points
- Rewards recognize past contributions; incentives encourage future value creation.
- Allocating shares by tenure and position can leave everyone feeling unfairly treated.
- The attitude “I was entitled to this anyway” can leave founders worse off on both fronts.
- Focus on the future, share the benefits, and share the risks.

Full text — English translation
These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.
DISCUSSION
Reader comments
What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.
Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.
Comments load when you reach this section.
Administrator sign-in Sign out