Trends & Emerging Technology

Taiwan After Its Demographic Dividend: Invest More and Dare to Innovate

Share this article
LINEFacebook

Robin’s commentary (as of April 2023; figures are approximate)

Storage information

Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.

Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above

English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2023-04-10. Translated 2026-10-31 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文

Reading guide

Robin sees the exhaustion of Taiwan’s demographic dividend as its greatest economic challenge, expressed in super-aging, fewer births, and crises facing labor and health insurance funds. His solutions are greater investment and bold innovation. He recalls two dividends: annual births above 400,000 in the 1960s, together with military personnel and civilians arriving from China; then Taiwanese businesses using China’s rural labor supply. With fewer than 140,000 births in 2022, he argues that Taiwan cannot sustain future growth on births alone. Put the wealth accumulated during those two dividends into new-era ventures and use people, resources, and markets worldwide.

Key points

  • The first demographic dividend: high birthrates in the 1960s.
  • The second: Taiwanese companies expanding into China to use its labor supply.
  • Births in 2022 were below 140,000—an approximate figure in the post.
  • Invest more, innovate boldly, and use people and resources worldwide.
A magnifying lens examines layered signals and data textures, suggesting technological exploration and judgment.
Trends & technologyThematic illustration · AI generated

Full text — English translation

Taiwan’s next step after its demographic dividend is exhausted. I still believe Taiwan’s greatest economic predicament is the exhaustion of its demographic dividend, visible in super-aging, low birthrates, and the risk of bankruptcy in labor and health insurance funds. The solutions are “invest more” and “dare to innovate.” The first demographic dividend: a very high proportion of newborns, plus military personnel and civilians brought from China by the Kuomintang. In the 1960s, Taiwan had over 400,000 births each year, continuing almost into the early 1980s. Its population in the 1960s was approximately 11–11.5 million, yet its annual births were at a level normally associated with a country of over 40 million. Large numbers of military personnel and civilians brought by the Kuomintang in the 1950s also helped establish the demographic foundation for decades of economic development. The second demographic dividend: Taiwanese companies moving west to use China’s large rural population. China began reform and opening in the 1980s, and Taiwanese businesses expanded there in force in the 1990s. Taiwan no longer had enough labor for labor-intensive textiles, footwear, electronic components, and assembly. Successive waves of companies established operations in China, drawing on abundant, inexpensive workers moving from farms to factories. Electronics companies such as Hon Hai could therefore assemble workforces a million strong in China. Taiwan’s economic development over the past half-century rested on fully using these two enormous demographic dividends. Looking ahead, however, it no longer has such a vast dividend. Births in 2022 fell below 140,000, roughly the number expected in a country of 13 million. It is clear that 130,000–140,000 newborns a year cannot sustain Taiwan’s future development needs. For the next generation, we should put the wealth accumulated through those two demographic dividends into new-era ventures: “innovate boldly” and “invest proactively and on a greater scale.” Make better use of people and resources worldwide and develop global markets further.

These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.

Share this article
LINEFacebook

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.

Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.

0 / 2000

Comments load when you reach this section.

    Administrator sign-in

    My reading notes

    These notes stay in this browser and are not published. Writing a note also saves the article. Back up or move your notes in My Reading.

    Manage my bookmarks and notes →

    STAY CURIOUS

    Save a good question for your next visit.

    Save this article, or follow the Facebook page and RSS feed for additions. Historical articles retain their original publication dates.

    Browse All articlesSearch articles and full text →