Trends & Emerging Technology

TSMC’s US$40–50 Billion Annual Capital Spending Is Almost Beyond Intel’s Reach

Share this article
LINEFacebook

Robin’s commentary (as of January 2022)

Storage information

Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.

Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above

English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2022-01-14. Translated 2026-11-05 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文

Reading guide

Robin argues that TSMC’s US$40–50 billion annual capital-spending scale is almost unaffordable for Intel. He considers talent, capital costs, focus, and business models: Taiwan concentrates technical talent at TSMC, while America’s best often go to Silicon Valley. He sees Samsung as the main competitor and EUV restrictions as a constraint on China.

Key points

  • Robin judges TSMC’s US$40–50 billion spending scale almost beyond Intel’s reach.
  • Taiwan concentrates engineering talent at TSMC; US talent often chooses Silicon Valley.
  • Capital costs, focus, and business models further support TSMC’s advantages.
  • Samsung is the main rival; EUV restrictions constrain China.
A magnifying lens examines layered signals and data textures, suggesting technological exploration and judgment.
Trends & technologyThematic illustration · AI generated

Full text — English translation

Annual capital spending of US$40 billion or US$50 billion is almost beyond what Intel can afford. Intel forecast 2021 revenue of US$73.5 billion and a 57% gross margin, using its official non-GAAP guidance basis. TSMC’s hard-to-shake advantages: 1. Taiwan’s workforce is both excellent and inexpensive. 2. TSMC absorbs almost all engineering and science students from Taiwan’s top and middle-ranked universities, including NTU, Tsing Hua, Chiao Tung, Cheng Kung, Central, and Sun Yat-sen. 3. Taiwan’s abundant, inexpensive capital supports continued investment and expansion. 4. TSMC effectively embodies a national effort involving education, economic affairs, science and technology, finance, financial regulation, and local governments. America’s best talent may instead build software and startups in Silicon Valley rather than concentrate in semiconductors. Engineers cost more, and financing costs are likely higher. Together with differences in focus and business model, this makes competing with TSMC in foundry services increasingly difficult for Intel over time. China wants to support chipmakers but cannot obtain crucial extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography equipment under restrictions, creating a bottleneck below 28 nm. It can only hope for TSMC expansion in China and some transfer of mature processes. Samsung remains TSMC’s main competitor. Yet differences in focus and business model may still allow TSMC to maintain its lead.

These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.

Share this article
LINEFacebook

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.

Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.

0 / 2000

Comments load when you reach this section.

    Administrator sign-in

    My reading notes

    These notes stay in this browser and are not published. Writing a note also saves the article. Back up or move your notes in My Reading.

    Manage my bookmarks and notes →

    STAY CURIOUS

    Save a good question for your next visit.

    Save this article, or follow the Facebook page and RSS feed for additions. Historical articles retain their original publication dates.

    Browse All articlesSearch articles and full text →