Venture Capital & Investing

The Power Law: An Imagined Conversation Between an Engineer and a Venture Capitalist

Share this article
LINEFacebook

Book excerpt + Robin’s commentary

Storage information

Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.

Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above

English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2023-03-12. Translated 2026-10-26 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文

Reading guide

An imagined scene from The Power Law: an engineer at a large company has a great idea but an unsupportive boss—Christensen’s innovator’s dilemma. Without VC, the idea dies. With VC, a conversation opens: quit and I will invest; never founded a business? I will help; need engineers? We have a database; worried about failure? We can find work elsewhere in the portfolio. Eric Schmidt reportedly joined Google because John Doerr promised another CEO role if it failed. VC offers more than money: it makes risk less frightening. Robin says Taiwan’s VC industry must work harder at helping founders build teams and introducing senior executives.

Key points

  • The innovator’s dilemma: a large-company boss will not support internal innovation.
  • VC offers four supports: capital, know-how, talent, and a fallback after failure.
  • John Doerr’s assurance reduced Eric Schmidt’s risk in joining Google.
  • Robin: Taiwan’s VCs need to do more to introduce senior executives.
Trees at different stages of growth with connected roots on cream paper, suggesting patient cultivation and lasting value.
Venture capital & investmentThematic illustration · AI generated

Full text — English translation

To understand venture capital’s power, imagine this scene: An engineer in a large company’s research department has a great idea. The boss may refuse support, fearing either that it will produce nothing or the opposite: an innovative product that takes customers from the company’s existing products. Professor Clayton Christensen calls this concern the innovator’s dilemma. Without venture capital, the frustrated engineer must abandon the idea, and the economy may never benefit from its potential. In a world with many venture capitalists, however, the engineer might meet one in a café, at a gathering, or in a stadium. Their conversation could go like this: --- Engineer: I work at a big company. I have a cool idea, but my boss does not like it. VC: Quit and start your own company. Engineer: But I lack money. VC: Do not worry. I will invest. Engineer: I have never started a company. VC: I have helped dozens of entrepreneurs do it. I will show you how. Engineer: I need six great engineers to build the product I envision, and do not know where to find them. VC: My firm has a database containing information on every engineer in the city. Engineer: Why would great engineers risk joining my small startup? Most startups fail. VC: True, but that is manageable. I will reassure them: there are other startups in my portfolio. If yours fails, I will find them jobs in those companies. What does this imagined conversation teach us? Entrepreneurship remains difficult and risky, but venture capitalists can make it less daunting. Google CEO Eric Schmidt told the author that when he joined, Google was young, and founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin seemed to think anyone over thirty had intellectual limitations. He agreed to the risk only because John Doerr assured him of a CEO position at another Doerr company if Google failed. In other words, Schmidt accepted failure risk not because of Silicon Valley culture but because of specific incentives supplied by a venture capitalist. #ThePowerLaw ---- Robin: ‘Taiwan’s VC industry must work harder at helping founders assemble teams and introducing senior executives.’

These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.

Share this article
LINEFacebook

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.

Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.

0 / 2000

Comments load when you reach this section.

    Administrator sign-in

    My reading notes

    These notes stay in this browser and are not published. Writing a note also saves the article. Back up or move your notes in My Reading.

    Manage my bookmarks and notes →

    STAY CURIOUS

    Save a good question for your next visit.

    Save this article, or follow the Facebook page and RSS feed for additions. Historical articles retain their original publication dates.

    Browse All articlesSearch articles and full text →