English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2021-11-14. Translated 2026-11-05 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文
Full text — English translation
Geoffrey Moore’s classic Crossing the Chasm was first published in 1991. Thirty years on, it has deeply influenced today’s technology innovators and entrepreneurs. All right, perhaps you are like Robin: you bought it but have not finished reading it.
Verification note: The thirty-year calculation reflects the post’s 2021 publication date. The book’s first edition was published in 1991.
The book is best known for describing five stages in the development of high-tech products and five corresponding types of consumers.
Its central question is why a promising technology company can suddenly stall or even decline, and how to address that problem. The author sees market understanding as the key: before this book, understanding of the market was partial and inaccurate; afterward, a better understanding can help you cross the “chasm” of failure.
The core idea is that high-tech companies fail with a product because they cannot cross the market’s “chasm.” Breaking that pattern requires recognizing the chasm and crossing it.
First, recognize the chasm. Before the mainstream market comes an early market.
A huge chasm separates the early market from the mainstream market for high-tech companies. Whether a high-tech product can cross it and enter the mainstream determines the success or failure of its commercialization.
Second, cross the chasm. Target a very specific segment within the mainstream market and concentrate all your resources on winning it. Then use that foothold to expand gradually across the broader mainstream market.
When there is time, we can return to the book’s three main topics: the technology adoption life cycle, understanding the chasm, and crossing it.
These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.
DISCUSSION
Reader comments
What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.
Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.
Comments load when you reach this section.
Administrator sign-in Sign out