Entrepreneurship & Strategy

Intel’s Exit from DRAM: A Historical Lens on Strategic Choices in 2021

Share this article
LINEFacebook

Robin’s commentary plus a historical-story excerpt (as of January 2021)

Storage information

Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.

Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above

English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2021-01-29. Translated 2026-10-31 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文

Reading guide

Using news of Intel’s foundry outsourcing plans, Robin observes that advanced manufacturing processes and packaging are capital-intensive markets in which catching up becomes extremely difficult once a company falls behind. Intel faces a choice between continuing to invest in manufacturing and focusing on chip design. He excerpts three considerations behind Intel’s historical exit from DRAM—its technological core, its full-product-line credo, and management’s pride—and the cost of laying off 7,200 employees. He then brings the question back to Intel’s new CEO in 2021, traditional travel agencies, and struggling founders: what would they decide?

Key points

  • Advanced manufacturing processes and packaging are both technology- and capital-intensive.
  • Three considerations in Intel’s exit from DRAM: its technological core, full product line, and management’s pride.
  • The decision cost 7,200 jobs, approximately one-third of Intel’s workforce at the time; excerpted figures, not independently verified.
  • Use history to ask how companies and founders facing difficulty would choose today.
One clear path continues into the distance among several branching routes, suggesting choice and focus.
Entrepreneurship & strategyThematic illustration · AI generated

Full text — English translation

I am singling out Intel because of the recent plans to outsource foundry orders—an opportunity to connect with the news. Advanced semiconductor manufacturing processes and advanced packaging are highly technical, capital-intensive markets. Once you fall behind at a process node, catching up through further investment is often extremely difficult. Intel, once the world leader in manufacturing technology, has begun falling behind TSMC and even Samsung. Should it invest more to catch up in manufacturing, or abandon wafer manufacturing and focus on chip development? This is another major strategic decision point. We can only look back at history to see what Intel considers when facing such choices. ----- Intel had three considerations in deciding whether to cut its most important core business: First, DRAM was not just a source of revenue; it was Intel’s technological core. Whenever the company developed a new technology, it tested it in DRAM first. For a company that revered technology, that mattered enormously. Second, Intel had always believed in a “full product line.” Without a complete range, it thought salespeople would struggle to face customers, meet their needs, and win orders. Third, and perhaps most importantly, was Intel’s pride. Even leaders as tough as Grove did not want to see the core business on which the company was founded close under their leadership. It would feel like an enormous failure. Ultimately, Intel’s decision helped shape a great company. But it cost 7,200 jobs—one-third of Intel’s total workforce at the time—and most of those employees had performed very well. ------ This story brings us back to the present. What decision will Intel’s newly appointed CEO make in 2021??? What changes will traditional travel agencies such as Lion Travel, Lifetour, Richmond Tours, and Phoenix Tours make in 2020–2021 as new travel trends emerge??? If you were a founder whose company was mired in difficulty, facing a hard choice, what would you decide???

These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.

Share this article
LINEFacebook

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.

Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.

0 / 2000

Comments load when you reach this section.

    Administrator sign-in

    My reading notes

    These notes stay in this browser and are not published. Writing a note also saves the article. Back up or move your notes in My Reading.

    Manage my bookmarks and notes →

    STAY CURIOUS

    Save a good question for your next visit.

    Save this article, or follow the Facebook page and RSS feed for additions. Historical articles retain their original publication dates.

    Browse All articlesSearch articles and full text →