Management & Organizations

Women Often Interview Better Than Men—Then What Happens?

Share this article
LINEFacebook

Robin’s observations

Storage information

Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.

Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above

English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2021-12-25. Translated 2026-10-28 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文

Reading guide

When Robin worked in underwriting, a supervisor remarked that women generally outperformed men of the same age in expertise, depth of thought, and expression. Yet securities work sometimes meant accompanying clients into uncomfortable or risky settings, so the firm lowered its hiring bar for some men to spare female colleagues those situations. Similar differences appeared at school: girls often had stronger grades and greater maturity. But broader conditions meant that 30 years later, most senior executives were again men. Board gender ratios became so unequal that reserving seats for women was actively encouraged and rewarded in governance evaluations and ESG. A candid observation on workplace gender disparities.

Key points

  • Interviews: women of the same age generally performed better.
  • Thirty years later, senior executives were nevertheless mostly men.
  • Women’s board representation became a positive factor in governance and ESG.
Distinct modular elements joined into a coordinated, balanced whole.
Management & organizationsThematic illustration · AI generated

Full text — English translation

When I worked in underwriting, I heard a supervisor lament that women generally outperformed men of the same age in interviews, whether in expertise, depth of thinking, or expression. But securities work sometimes required accompanying clients into risky or unpleasant situations. They therefore lowered the bar to hire some men, rather than leave female colleagues to accompany client bosses into such places. You could see something similar in school: top students were generally girls, who were also more mature than boys of the same age. Yet broader environmental factors meant that, 30 years later, senior executives were again mostly men. Board gender ratios, for example, were so unequal that reserving seats for women was actively encouraged, earning substantial credit in corporate-governance evaluations and ESG.

These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.

Share this article
LINEFacebook

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.

Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.

0 / 2000

Comments load when you reach this section.

    Administrator sign-in

    My reading notes

    These notes stay in this browser and are not published. Writing a note also saves the article. Back up or move your notes in My Reading.

    Manage my bookmarks and notes →

    STAY CURIOUS

    Save a good question for your next visit.

    Save this article, or follow the Facebook page and RSS feed for additions. Historical articles retain their original publication dates.

    Browse All articlesSearch articles and full text →