English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2024-03-25. Translated 2026-11-05 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文
Reading guide
Shareholders are long-term partners, not funding sources you can replace at will. Comparing CVC and VC resources, interests, and risks, this column advises founders to investigate investors’ reputations while cash is still sufficient and consider whether the shareholder mix supports long-term cooperation.
Key points
Equity partnerships last and are difficult to exit; choose shareholders carefully.
Strategic resources can bring labeling, conflicts of interest, and disclosure risks.
Fundraising is mutual selection; investigate investors’ collaboration records.
Entrepreneurship & strategyThematic illustration · AI generated
Full text — English translation
Founders usually first ask one another, ‘What do you do?’ The second question is often, ‘Who are your shareholders?’ Without knowing you or the company, people use shareholders as an initial signal. Their names can help when you first enter the business world.
Under company law, shareholders own the company and influence it. Choosing good shareholders is a key success factor. Their strengths often shape yours; their composition influences future achievements. They can be seen as the company’s genes, determining its origins and much of its future.
More shareholders are not necessarily better. Choose carefully. Debt can generally be repaid: if Bank B offers better terms and cooperation than Bank A, move the banking relationship. Shareholders are easy to invite and difficult to remove. They own part of the company; even if unsuitable for its future, you cannot simply make them leave. Unless a major crisis is imminent, taking no investor may be preferable to taking an unsuitable one.
After seed and angel stages, institutional funding—generally around Series A—often means choosing corporate venture capital (CVC) or independent VC. Direct business from CVC is welcome, but familiar drawbacks include being labeled and forced to take sides. Large companies also have their own interests and long-term plans. Alphabet invested in both Uber and Lyft, while its self-driving business Waymo litigated against Uber. Google and Uber thus have a delicate relationship involving ownership, competition, cooperation, and litigation.
CVC primarily seeks business synergies and usually participates more deeply. Independent VC, generally a financial investor, focuses post-investment management on financial statements and business discussion. CVC explores integration deeply, potentially exposing almost everything about the startup to the parent company. New risks arise because the corporate investor operates related businesses. Stories recur of companies investing to discover new business directions, only to develop them themselves.
Investment brings trade-offs; keeping relationships simple is an option. Everyone wants smart money, but sometimes it is smarter than expected and creates new problems. Ideally, shareholders include strategic CVC and financial VC, balancing their strengths and using each to support the other.
Selection goes both ways. VC chooses promising businesses; founders can choose long-term partners. Investigate beforehand. Seek reputable VCs where possible, asking about past investments and available resources through different channels. The best management teams survive decades of market cycles and repeated fundraising, giving them the staying power to accompany your business. VC is capital-intensive, but even more intensive in experience and resources.
Recognized good investors do not commit lightly. They may already have many opportunities, high standards, and established, lengthy review processes. While you still have room to maneuver, spending time pursuing and waiting for suitable shareholders is wise. May you find the right partners for your entrepreneurial journey.
These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.
What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.
Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.
DISCUSSION
Reader comments
What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.
Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.
Comments load when you reach this section.
Administrator sign-in Sign out