ROBIN’S FIELD NOTES

English articles

736 English translations · Page 12 of 19.

English translations are being added article by article. The Chinese collection contains 858 articles; 736 currently have a full English translation. Dates refer to the original posts.

Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Well-Resourced and Grassroots Teams Have Equal Odds: Think Clearly About Customer Value

Robin’s commentary plus an external quotation (Quibi example; source not identified)

Reading guide

Robin observes that highly resourced, privileged teams and grassroots teams have roughly equal chances of success, with strengths and weaknesses offsetting one another. The former have more opportunities but higher costs and more escape routes, and may retreat more readily or raise and spend too much. The latter use resources carefully and persist through problems. He urges founders to clarify what problem they solve and what value they create for whom. Vague positioning can leave a team confused about its own direction. The closing Quibi excerpt warns against becoming dependent on the path of past success.

Key points

  • Well-resourced and grassroots teams have different strengths and weaknesses but roughly similar success rates; Robin’s observation, not statistics.
  • Highly resourced teams have higher costs, more escape routes, and may retreat more readily.
  • Grassroots teams use resources carefully and persist through problems.
  • The vaguer the positioning, the easier it is to lose direction.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Think from the End State: Keep a Startup’s Beginning and Destination on the Same Thread

Robin’s commentary

Reading guide

Robin uses the analogy of going blank halfway through speaking: without establishing a starting point and an endpoint for your thinking, you can lose the thread. Entrepreneurship works the same way. Like Bezos, work backward from the end state to plan each step. Keep checking your key waypoints to avoid being diverted by small short-term gains. Minimize improvisation rather than simply solving whatever problem appears. The greatest value of identifying the end state is training the awareness needed to stay on topic.

Key points

  • Both speaking and entrepreneurship require anchoring the starting point and endpoint.
  • Work backward from the end state to plan each step today.
  • Minimize improvisation and avoid merely solving immediate problems.
  • End-state thinking trains the awareness needed to stay on topic.
Read in English
Venture Capital & InvestingEnglish translation

The Most Connected Will Win—and the Power of Capital Markets

Robin’s commentary plus an external interview excerpt (interviewee not named)

Reading guide

Robin highlights two points. First, in the internet era, those with the most connections win. He cites Tencent’s shift after the 3Q conflict toward investing in JD.com, Pinduoduo, and others to build an ecosystem. Second is the power of capital and the connections it creates. The interview excerpt describes each fundraising round as a chance to explain the company’s plans to the market. It also reflects on subsidy battles and wars of attrition: the market will not give you money when you truly need it.

Key points

  • In the internet era, the most connected may win—not necessarily those best at products.
  • Tencent shifted from doing everything itself to investment alliances and an ecosystem.
  • Each fundraising process is a chance to explain the company to the market.
  • The interviewee is not named; subsidy amounts and profit-and-loss figures have not been independently verified.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Keep Products and Business Models Simple: Give Users the 5% of Features They Actually Use

Robin’s commentary plus an external article (Manny’s Newsletter)

Reading guide

Robin warns that products and business models can become increasingly complex. He recalls reading that most Evernote users use only approximately 5% of its features—an impression, not a statistical finding—and guesses Word and Excel are similar. He argues for simplicity and solving important problems, leaving many additional functions to compatible third-party software. He also makes two observations: Estonia produced Skype and Pipedrive, and Taiwanese startups should likewise face the world boldly; as giants become general-purpose platforms, startups should concentrate like a nail to achieve a breakthrough.

Key points

  • Adding complexity for a small minority’s needs can make users give up learning the product.
  • Keep it simple, solve important problems, and leave extensions to third parties.
  • Taiwanese startups need to face the world boldly to produce unicorns.
  • As giants build platforms, startups should concentrate resources like a nail to break through.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Two Prerequisites for a Platform: An Exceptional Core and Genuine Neutrality

Robin’s commentary

Reading guide

Robin identifies two prerequisites for building a large platform: the core function must be exceptional and globally unmatched; and the platform must be sufficiently neutral, avoiding competition with customers and earning the trust of customers and competitors alike. He contrasts TSMC, which does not design ICs and puts customers at ease, with Samsung, whose design business leaves customers with doubts. He also warns that Amazon’s pursuit of continued growth may bring it into competition with customers. Once it loses neutrality and trust, customers will begin leaving.

Key points

  • First prerequisite: make the core function exceptional.
  • Second prerequisite: remain neutral and do not compete with customers.
  • TSMC does not design ICs, allowing customers and competitors to trust it.
  • Growth pressure can push platforms into competing with customers and losing trust.
Read in English
Venture Capital & InvestingEnglish translation

Buying Cheap Is Not the Main Point: Holding and Exiting Determine Returns

Robin’s commentary

Reading guide

When discussing acquisitions and mergers, we usually consider synergies, but price is another critical factor. Robin argues that strategically minded entrepreneurs can look beyond the immediate price. Investors often deliberate over one or two units, or even half a unit, in the entry share price, but for a genuinely attractive investment this is insignificant beside the prospect of returns exceeding tenfold. Buying is an art; holding and exiting are harder. He says the holding period is what truly determines returns, and exiting too early or too late has the greatest impact.

Key points

  • When strategic value is high, do not obsess over small differences in the entry price.
  • Buying is an art; holding and exiting are harder.
  • Returns depend on the holding period and exit timing.
  • Returns exceeding tenfold are an illustration, not a guarantee or trading recommendation.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Intel’s Exit from DRAM: A Historical Lens on Strategic Choices in 2021

Robin’s commentary plus a historical-story excerpt (as of January 2021)

Reading guide

Using news of Intel’s foundry outsourcing plans, Robin observes that advanced manufacturing processes and packaging are capital-intensive markets in which catching up becomes extremely difficult once a company falls behind. Intel faces a choice between continuing to invest in manufacturing and focusing on chip design. He excerpts three considerations behind Intel’s historical exit from DRAM—its technological core, its full-product-line credo, and management’s pride—and the cost of laying off 7,200 employees. He then brings the question back to Intel’s new CEO in 2021, traditional travel agencies, and struggling founders: what would they decide?

Key points

  • Advanced manufacturing processes and packaging are both technology- and capital-intensive.
  • Three considerations in Intel’s exit from DRAM: its technological core, full product line, and management’s pride.
  • The decision cost 7,200 jobs, approximately one-third of Intel’s workforce at the time; excerpted figures, not independently verified.
  • Use history to ask how companies and founders facing difficulty would choose today.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Microsoft’s Baggage Shows How Startups Can Challenge Giants

Robin’s commentary (following an external article in the preceding post)

Reading guide

Robin contrasts Ballmer’s repeated emphasis on “we” with Nadella’s language of empathy and listening to customers. He argues that Microsoft’s old monopoly rested on Windows, while engineering pride made it difficult for the giant to change direction. The challenge involved products, management, and culture. Startups therefore have opportunities to challenge giants, whose baggage is even heavier. But startups must be more focused, faster, and more adaptable, targeting subtle shifts that the giants have not noticed.

Key points

  • Robin contrasts Ballmer’s and Nadella’s language.
  • A monopoly can make a large company slow to change; management and culture matter.
  • The heavier a giant’s baggage, the greater the opportunity for startups.
  • Startups must focus, move quickly, stay flexible, and target subtle changes.
Read in English
Capital Markets & GovernanceEnglish translation

The Golden Arches Theory: Economic Development May Bring Peace, but Human Desires for Power Are Harder to Predict

Robin’s commentary plus a retelling of Friedman’s theory (as of February 2021)

Reading guide

Robin introduces Thomas Friedman’s Golden Arches theory: two countries with McDonald’s restaurants will not go to war with each other, because societies with McDonald’s have stable economies and strong middle classes, and their interest in development and consumption outweighs ideology. At its core, this is an expectation of rational human behavior. Extended further, countries in the same global supply chain will not fight each other. Robin hopes economic development and democratization will advance peace, but ends with a qualification: human nature and the desire for power are harder to predict.

Key points

  • Friedman’s Golden Arches theory: countries with McDonald’s will not go to war with each other.
  • Underlying it is an expectation of the rational actor of economics.
  • Countries in the same global supply chain face high economic costs from war.
  • Robin’s qualification: human nature and the desire for power are harder to predict.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Two Lessons from Nike: Find Your First Passionate Users—and the Story of Air Cushioning

Robin’s brief commentary plus course excerpts (tagged #Dedao #ZhangXiaoyuClassicBusinessCaseCourse)

Reading guide

Robin’s main point is that startups lack the resources to build broad platforms for everyone. They must pay close attention to their earliest users, just as MUJI focuses on customers who share its values. The post also quotes Paul Graham’s idea that one hundred passionate fans are better than ten thousand people who merely think a product is acceptable. It recounts Nike’s beginnings among track-and-field enthusiasts, and Frank Rudy’s pitch for air-cushioning technology, which Phil Knight agreed to test and license through per-pair royalties.

Key points

  • Startups must pay close attention to their earliest users.
  • One hundred passionate fans are better than ten thousand people who merely think a product is acceptable; attributed to Paul Graham.
  • Nike, Reebok, Under Armour, and Lululemon began with specific customer groups.
  • The Air technology story is excerpted from a course; its source, dates, and details have not been independently verified.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

The Rise and Fall of Sears: Seizing One Era’s Opportunities, Then Being Replaced by the Next

External historical-story excerpt (source not provided) plus Robin’s brief commentary

Reading guide

The post recounts how Sears founder Richard Sears rose through successive opportunities: nationwide rail connections, standardized time zones, postal access and mail order, and urbanization. It then describes Sears’s failure to seize the next opportunities represented by Walmart and Amazon, leading to bankruptcy in 2018. Robin closes by arguing that retail has moved from consumers actively searching to merchants proactively recommending products. Increasing segmentation, differentiated audiences, and customization create new business opportunities.

Key points

  • Sears rose by seizing opportunities in railways, time zones, mail order, and urbanization.
  • Walmart seized data-driven purchasing, while Amazon seized the internet opportunity.
  • Sears went bankrupt in 2018, according to the excerpt; not independently verified.
  • Robin: retail is moving toward proactive recommendations, audience segmentation, and customization.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyFeaturedEnglish translation

Broadening Perspective through Zhuangzi’s Autumn Floods: Put Your Team in a Bigger World

Robin’s commentary plus quotations from Zhuangzi, “Autumn Floods”

Reading guide

Robin explains why he encourages teams to spend more time abroad. Taiwan’s market is limited, and a team that feels impressive only at home can resemble the River God or the summer insect in Zhuangzi. The best way to broaden perspective is to enter a larger market and experience its impact firsthand. Drawing on the River God’s encounter with the North Sea in “Autumn Floods,” he argues that success often depends on breadth of understanding rather than effort alone. Perspective depends on one’s environment, so spend time with people who are better than you.

Key points

  • Teams that remain only in Taiwan’s market can become complacent.
  • Put yourself in a bigger market and experience its impact to broaden your perspective.
  • Zhuangzi’s “Autumn Floods”: the River God sees the North Sea; a summer insect cannot be told about ice.
  • Perspective depends on environment; associate with people who are better than you.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

The Disappearance Test: Would the World Be Different Without Your Product?

Robin’s commentary plus an external Q&A excerpt (Wu Jun on Evernote)

Reading guide

Robin identifies three questions founders need to clarify: how strongly target users need the product; whether users could easily switch away without noticing its absence; and whether losing it would cause major inconvenience. The less replaceable a company is, the more valuable it becomes. He includes Wu Jun’s response to a reader asking why Evernote struggled. Wu argues that the product was not essential enough and its timing was squeezed by Google Docs and Office. Robin says their views are similar.

Key points

  • The intensity of demand determines whether a product can gain traction.
  • If users can easily switch when your product disappears, it lacks necessity.
  • The less replaceable a company is, the more valuable it becomes.
  • Wu Jun’s views on Evernote are externally quoted; figures and subsequent speculation have not been independently verified.
Read in English
Venture Capital & InvestingEnglish translation

Set Your Fundraising Pace: Raise While You Still Have Cash, and Start the Next Round Before Half Is Gone

Excerpts of Lei Jun’s fundraising views plus Robin’s eight points (as of July 2021)

Reading guide

The post first excerpts Lei Jun’s views: fundraising is a confidence game, easiest when you do not need money. Start raising when half the cash is spent; with no cash left, bargaining power is nearly gone. Robin then offers eight suggestions: the fundraising paradox is that money attracts money; begin the next round before half is spent; match burn rate to fundraising pace; investors who fear a difficult next round or a down round may discount or decline this one; cash gives negotiating confidence; win existing investors’ support, ideally with stable backers holding at least 30%; produce clear results that bring investors to you; and tailor the pitch to each investor.

Key points

  • The fundraising paradox: having money helps you raise money.
  • Begin the next round before half the cash has been burned.
  • Stable, continuing backers holding at least 30% can make fundraising calmer; Robin’s experiential suggestion, not a legal threshold.
  • Customize the pitch around what matters to each investor.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Build a Monopoly in a Niche—but Do Not Define the Market Too Narrowly

Robin’s commentary (as of July 2021)

Reading guide

Robin begins with the idea that people remember only number one. In the internet era, being first means monopoly, with neither oligopoly nor perfect competition. If a giant already occupies a position, create a new market through a better category: Facebook dominates social networking, while Twitter and Instagram carved out text- and image-based markets. PayPal, Square, and Stripe provide similar examples. He adds that a niche monopoly is sensible, but becoming number one on a particular road or in a particular building is meaningless if the market is too small. VCs still assess market size and growth potential.

Key points

  • In the internet era, number one often represents a monopoly.
  • A well-defined category can create an entirely new market.
  • Defining a market too narrowly makes it too small to matter.
  • VCs still assess market size, growth trends, and potential.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Learn to Subtract: Simplicity Gives a Startup Strength

Robin’s commentary

Reading guide

Robin argues that addition is easy. Taiwanese consumers value getting more for the same price, so founders and product builders often keep adding features—a tendency he personally considers dangerous. He cites TA-Q-BIN, Tamagoya, and Yoshinoya as examples of doing one thing exceptionally well. Entrepreneurship requires subtraction: remove the unnecessary and focus attention on the most important problem. Startups’ advantages are flexibility, focus, and speed; giant platforms can be left to giant companies. Many startups stack AI, IoT, blockchain, cloud, big data, 5G, and NFTs until they can no longer explain their business in one sentence.

Key points

  • Addition is easy; subtraction makes focus possible.
  • Do one thing exceptionally well, as in the TA-Q-BIN, Tamagoya, and Yoshinoya examples.
  • Startups’ advantages are flexibility, focus, and speed.
  • Stacking fashionable technology terms makes it hard to explain what you do.
Read in English
Management & OrganizationsEnglish translation

Do Not Worry About Talent Going Abroad—Worry About Whether It Wants to Return

Robin’s commentary (as of July 2021)

Reading guide

Discussing the indicator of students studying abroad immediately after high school, Robin offers a different perspective. Earlier generations of talented Taiwanese graduates went abroad, saw the world, and brought back technology and new perspectives. Today, many remain at leading Taiwanese universities for master’s degrees and are recruited early by major companies. He worries about a gap in Taiwan’s ability to connect with the world, while Taiwanese students in the United States are increasingly outnumbered by Chinese and Indian students. He welcomes talented high school graduates attending leading foreign universities. The real question is whether Taiwan offers enough incentive for them to return.

Key points

  • Earlier generations studied abroad and brought technology back to Taiwan.
  • Staying in Taiwan for further study may create a gap in connections with the world.
  • Welcome talented students studying abroad rather than worry about their departure.
  • The key is creating incentives for them to return to Taiwan.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Attention > Time > Money: Buy Back Time and Focus Your Attention on Output

Robin’s commentary

Reading guide

Robin ranks three resources in entrepreneurship: attention above time, and time above money. Buying other people’s time and services is usually worthwhile; use the time saved for more valuable work. He also repeats a point he often makes: a startup’s window of opportunity opens briefly and narrowly, and may close when giants and capital enter, so establish your position early. Finally, he reminds readers that they may have only three to five hours of genuinely focused, productive time each day; do not scatter that attention.

Key points

  • Resource priorities: attention > time > money.
  • Trading money for other people’s time and services is usually worthwhile.
  • A startup’s window of opportunity is short: establish your position before giants and capital enter.
  • Focused, productive time may be only three to five hours a day—Robin’s personal estimate.
Read in English
Management & OrganizationsEnglish translation

Google’s “Think 10x Bigger” Approach: When Does It Fit?

A retelling of an external methodology (Google), plus two comments by Robin

Reading guide

The main text describes how Google challenges rigid thinking by asking people to make an idea ten times bigger. It tests an idea’s maturity through three questions: could it affect hundreds of millions or billions of people; does it contain a distinctive technical insight; and could it become feasible soon? Robin comments that employees should pursue tenfold breakthroughs rather than 10% or 20% improvements. But the approach does not fit every situation: a small startup may struggle to find a narrow entry point if its scope is too broad. Fundraising in Taiwan tends to require concrete results, whereas this approach can help when raising internationally.

Key points

  • Google challenges rigid thinking by asking people to make ideas ten times bigger.
  • Three questions: could it affect billions of people, offer a technical insight, and become feasible soon?
  • Robin: a small startup thinking too broadly may struggle to find a narrow starting point.
  • Robin: this approach suits international fundraising; fundraising in Taiwan places more weight on concrete results—his personal observation.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Seven Reflections After FITI Reviews: Pool Resources, Clarify the Endgame, Stay Asset-Light, and Find Real Demand

Robin’s reflections (as of October 2021; program names and eligibility refer to that time)

Reading guide

After completing his FITI reviews, Robin shares seven points: similar teams can join forces to compete internationally; use national resources such as Ministry of Science and Technology and Ministry of Economic Affairs programs and the National Development Fund’s angel investment program; decide whether the endgame is acquisition or an IPO; making a product or obtaining certification is not the ultimate test—selling it worldwide is. A customer saying “sounds good; we’ll evaluate it once it’s built” is usually negative; someone with real demand wants to pay before completion. Professor-led student startups should include someone who has run a business, and R&D startups should stay asset-light and outsource where possible.

Key points

  • Similar startup teams can pool resources rather than duplicate effort.
  • Use public programs and funds; achieve results before leaving university to establish a company.
  • Clarify the endgame—acquisition or IPO—because the planning differs.
  • “We’ll evaluate it once it’s built” is usually negative; real demand means wanting to buy before it exists.
  • R&D startups should stay asset-light and focus on what matters most.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Who Is Your Real Customer? Focus, Make Trade-Offs, and Conduct In-Depth Interviews Before Building

An external account of the “godfather of semiconductors” discussing customers (original interview not linked), plus Robin’s commentary

Reading guide

The opening account says TSMC’s business model is determined by who its customers are: other semiconductor companies. It emphasizes technical support rather than personal connections. Robin then asks: who is your real customer? An early-stage startup must focus and make trade-offs; it cannot build a platform for everyone. Before rushing to build, understand target customers through in-depth interviews, confirm demand, then create an MVP, validate it, and iterate quickly. There is little need to rush to investors beforehand: they will ask about interviews and data, and do not want a CEO operating on instinct alone.

Key points

  • A business model is determined by who the customer is, rather than what the product is.
  • Focus and make trade-offs early: choose one ladleful from a vast river.
  • Interview deeply to confirm demand, then build an MVP, validate, and iterate.
  • Investors expect interviews and data, rather than a CEO relying on instinct alone.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Netflix and Disney in Taiwan: A Small Country Should Concentrate on Its Strengths

Robin’s commentary (as of November 2021)

Reading guide

Watching Netflix and Disney compete in Taiwan, Robin argues that foreign giants already dominate its OTT market, much as Google and Facebook dominate online advertising. At that time, platforms with the largest user bases are difficult to dislodge; Taiwan is an incremental market for them. Using domestic cars as an example, he argues that once tariff protection is removed, tooling amortization and sales scale make it hard for local manufacturers to compete—the figures are hypothetical examples. His conclusion: Taiwan is small, so identify core and comparative advantages and concentrate scarce resources on strengths other countries cannot easily replicate.

Key points

  • Foreign giants dominate Taiwan’s OTT and online advertising markets.
  • At that time, players with the largest existing user bases are difficult to dislodge.
  • Domestic cars illustrate disadvantages in tooling amortization and sales scale; the figures are hypothetical.
  • Small countries should abandon the urge to do everything and focus resources on their strengths.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

What Is a Startup? A Temporary Organization Aiming for Rapid Growth in a Short Time

Robin shares and explains an external definition

Reading guide

Robin finds an interesting definition: a startup is a temporary organization aiming for rapid growth in a short time. Even a newly established company is an ordinary new business if rapid near-term growth is not its objective. A restaurant or hair salon’s ceiling depends on its premises and spending per customer; a custom software outsourcer’s ceiling depends on customer spending. Neither type is better: they simply pursue different goals.

Key points

  • A startup’s defining aim is rapid growth in a short time.
  • A company aiming only for steady growth is an ordinary new business, not a startup under this definition.
  • IT outsourcers and physical shops face growth ceilings shaped by customers and premises.
  • Neither startups nor ordinary new businesses are inherently better.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

SaaS Founders Must Make Trade-Offs: Walk Away from Big Customers Who Demand Customization

Robin’s commentary (as of January 2022)

Reading guide

Robin believes the most important discipline in a SaaS startup is making trade-offs. After wrestling with the decision, firmly walk away from large customers demanding customization; otherwise, they can drain your capacity to innovate and turn you into a labor-intensive software contractor. He points to Basecamp and Taiwan’s iCHEF CEO as examples of knowing what the company needs at its current stage and who its customers are. If a VC asks why you do not serve certain customers or build certain features, his preferred answer is: we make clear trade-offs; those are not right for this stage, and we have clear target customers and a product-development sequence.

Key points

  • Customization for large customers can leave you managing dozens of versions.
  • SaaS must scale rather than become contract software development.
  • Thank customers who are not a fit and refer them elsewhere.
  • When a VC presses you, explain your clear trade-offs and development priorities.
Read in English
Management & OrganizationsEnglish translation

Jobs Chose Tim Cook as His Successor: Choose Someone Who Complements You

Robin’s commentary (as of February 2022)

Reading guide

Robin looks back at Jobs recruiting Sculley, being forced out, and returning to Apple after the 1996 NeXT acquisition. He notes that in 2011 Jobs chose Tim Cook, whose personality was the opposite of his and whose operational abilities were exceptional, rather than widely favored design leader Jony Ive. Robin personally admires Jobs’s late-life judgment of people and ability to put them in the right roles: seeing future trends and finding the most suitable successor.

Key points

  • Jobs was forced out of Apple and later returned through the NeXT acquisition.
  • He chose Tim Cook, whose personality was the opposite of his, as his successor.
  • Operational management and design talent serve different roles.
  • Robin admires Jobs’s judgment of people and succession decisions.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Lessons from the Race to the South Pole: Your Sustainable Best Beats a Brief All-Out Push

Robin’s synthesis (as of February 2022)

Reading guide

Robin draws five lessons from the story of conquering the South Pole: a major opportunity is rarely visible to you alone—many people race to be first; history remembers first place; thorough preparation, spare capacity, and flexibility help you stay calm when making critical decisions; cohesion matters more than team size; and disciplined daily progress, in good conditions or bad, determines the outcome. In extreme environments, doing your best is not enough: do your sustainable best. Small daily steps become a large advance when you look back.

Key points

  • A major opportunity often attracts many people competing to be first.
  • Prepare thoroughly and retain spare capacity and flexibility to make calm decisions.
  • Team unity and cohesion matter more than headcount.
  • Do your sustainable best through disciplined daily progress.
Read in English
Venture Capital & InvestingEnglish translation

To Young VCs: Stop Chasing Every Trend and Build Your Own Core Strength

Robin’s commentary (as of March 2022)

Reading guide

Robin writes to young venture capital professionals: VCs often tell founders to focus, cut back on nonessential activities, and stop chasing trends, yet frequently chase trends themselves. In his ten years in the industry, the hot sector has changed almost every one or two years—from games, software, the internet, and the sharing economy to AI, blockchain, electric vehicles, and the metaverse. He argues that VCs should calmly identify their core strengths and what makes them irreplaceable, then build those strengths deliberately. With enough accumulated resources, they may even create a trend themselves. The advice VCs give founders applies equally to their own careers.

Key points

  • VCs urge founders to focus but often chase trends themselves.
  • The hot sector changes almost every one or two years—Robin’s personal observation.
  • Identify your core strengths and what makes you irreplaceable.
  • Build deliberately, potentially accumulating the resources to create a trend yourself.
Read in English
Venture Capital & InvestingEnglish translation

Angel Investing Versus an Angel Fund: Robin’s Basic Understanding

Robin’s personal understanding (as of April 2022; explicitly preliminary, not a professional definition)

Reading guide

Someone asks how angel investing differs from an angel fund. In Robin’s basic understanding, angel groups—of which Taiwan has several—discuss incoming opportunities, then each angel decides individually whether to invest, using their own money and taking responsibility for their own decisions. An angel fund pools money under unified management and makes a collective invest-or-pass decision; in that sense, it can be viewed as institutional investing. Angel groups charge membership fees, whereas funds charge management fees, such as 2%, and share investment profits, such as 20%; these are examples. He welcomes corrections and additions from practitioners.

Key points

  • Individual angels make their own decisions and bear their own gains or losses.
  • An angel fund pools capital under unified management, resembling institutional investing.
  • Angel groups charge membership fees; angel funds charge management fees and share profits.
  • The 2% and 20% figures are examples, not the actual fees of a specified fund.
Read in English
Venture Capital & InvestingEnglish translation

Five Points on Startup Fundraising Prices: Have Evidence, Think Like an Investor, and Avoid Repeated Cuts

Robin’s commentary (as of April 2022; figures are illustrative)

Reading guide

Robin offers five points on fundraising prices: research the market first, with an asking price supported by evidence, comparisons, and calculations. Seeking investors means seeking partners—not demanding they pay your price because you think the company is wonderful. Investing is a confidence game; starting high and cutting repeatedly, for example from 150 million to 50 million, erodes confidence. Competitive investor demand may allow a modest increase, but otherwise investors tend to wait. Do not negotiate an investment when you have no bargaining chips left.

Key points

  • Research the market and support your asking price with evidence.
  • Think about financing from the perspective of investors and prospective partners.
  • Repeated price cuts undermine investor confidence; the amounts are illustrative.
  • Do not negotiate when you have no bargaining chips left.
Read in English
Capital Markets & GovernanceEnglish translation

The Taiwan–US CPI Gap and CPC’s Absorbed Costs: The Price of Price Controls

Robin’s commentary (as of April 2022; figures are from news reports at that time)

Reading guide

Robin compares US March CPI inflation of 8.5% year on year with Taiwan’s 2.47%. He argues that Taiwan’s low inflation reflects deliberate government price controls, with the Fair Trade Commission and Ministry of Economic Affairs intervening when companies announce increases. He cites CPC: frozen natural gas prices meant it absorbed 104.8 billion in costs in 2021 and another 51.7 billion in the first quarter of 2022, losing roughly half its capital. He speculates that with free-market pricing, imported energy and food, and wage increases amid labor shortages, Taiwan’s year-on-year CPI inflation might exceed 10%—Robin’s hypothetical scenario.

Key points

  • March CPI inflation was 8.5% in the US and 2.47% in Taiwan, as stated in April 2022.
  • Taiwan relies heavily on imported energy and food.
  • CPC’s absorbed natural gas costs had consumed roughly half its capital; these reported figures have not been independently verified.
  • CPI inflation might exceed 10% with free-market adjustments—Robin’s hypothetical scenario.
Read in English
Venture Capital & InvestingEnglish translation

Bubbles, Slumps, and Recovery: Crises Incubate the Next Big Thing

Robin’s commentary (as of June 2022; not a promise of returns)

Reading guide

Robin argues that industries and economies cycle through bubbles, slumps, and recovery. Uncompetitive companies are eliminated, while survivors reach new highs; he cites Google and Amazon after the 2000 dot-com bubble. Crises also incubate larger opportunities: Bitcoin and blockchain, the sharing economy, cloud services, and SaaS emerged after 2008. As another storm gathers in 2022, he argues that early-stage investors should think harder about the next big thing and position themselves a year or two ahead—waiting where the wind will blow rather than chasing it.

Key points

  • Industries and economies cycle through bubbles, slumps, and recovery.
  • Technology giants that survived the dot-com bubble later reached new highs.
  • Crises incubate opportunities, as illustrated by industries after 2008—a retrospective attribution.
  • Early-stage investors should position for the next trend in advance rather than chase it.
Read in English
Venture Capital & InvestingEnglish translation

When Capital Tightens, Simplification Matters Most

Robin’s commentary (as of June 2022)

Reading guide

Robin looks back at years of abundant global capital, when FOMO and the belief that another buyer would always come along encouraged fast decisions even on marginal deals. Since the second half of the previous year, tighter capital has made investors more rational and slowed peers’ decisions: deals they might once have taken or passed on are now declined. Startups must reconsider their venture and explain why it is necessary; simplification becomes the central concern. Investors should return to fundamentals, verify more, and judge independently. Do not convince yourself too easily: the person most likely to deceive you may be yourself.

Key points

  • When capital is abundant, investors often fund deals they could just as easily pass on.
  • As capital tightens, investment decisions become slower and more rational.
  • Startups must reconsider the venture and their explanation of why it is necessary.
  • Investors need more verification and independent judgment; do not persuade yourself too easily.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

A User-Interview Trap: Asking Hypothetical Questions

A retelling of YC advice, with Robin’s example (as of July 2022)

Reading guide

Following the previous point about talking less and listening more, this post warns against hypotheticals: asking “If we built this feature, would you use it or pay for it?” is the wrong approach. Ask about specific events that have already happened in users’ lives instead. Robin gives an example: asking whether someone would be interested in cutting costs by 20% and improving efficiency by 15% is hypothetical and leads them toward the answer you want. Such interviews are meaningless. Understand the path and motivations that brought users to the problem.

Key points

  • Do not ask whether users would use or pay for a feature if you built it.
  • Ask instead about specific events that have already happened in their lives.
  • Hypothetical questions lead people toward your predetermined answer.
  • Understand the user’s path, context, and motivations.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

World-Changing Inventions Are Often Simple: How Can You Tell When Yours Is Too Complicated?

Robin’s commentary (as of July 2022)

Reading guide

Robin argues that world-changing inventions are often extremely simple: easy to understand and explain, flexible, and open to layers of applications. Business models should likewise be simple and focused, doing one thing well at a time. If you cannot explain your product, service, and model quickly, they are too complicated; start over if necessary and narrow the battlefield rather than launching on four fronts with eight products. His three tests: can you explain it on one A4 page, in six minutes, and to the grandmother selling vegetables on the corner?

Key points

  • Simple things are flexible and support layers of applications.
  • Keep the business model as simple and focused as possible.
  • Three tests: one A4 page, six minutes, and an explanation the grandmother on the corner can understand.
  • Narrow the battlefield rather than launch on every front at once.
Read in English
Management & OrganizationsEnglish translation

How Can Startups Hire Excellent People While Paying Less Than Big Companies?

Robin’s commentary (as of August 2022)

Reading guide

Robin argues that startups can attract excellent engineers away from big companies by presenting their ideas, dreams, and goals. They need employees willing and able to take risks; those seeking comfort choose major technology companies. Explain that the journey and growth can matter more than the outcome. A new hire at a startup can receive major responsibilities and challenges sooner, quickly becoming a key person for a product or market. Even if the company fails, they gain experience unavailable to junior employees at large firms, where reaching a key product role may take more than ten years.

Key points

  • Attract people willing to take risks through ideas, dreams, and goals.
  • Explain why the journey and growth can matter more than the outcome.
  • Startups can offer responsibility and challenges sooner.
  • A key product role at a large company may take more than ten years—Robin’s rough estimate from experience.
Read in English
Venture Capital & InvestingEnglish translation

Pitch Storytelling Can Be Trained—but Beware of Overused Stories

Robin’s experience (as of September 2022, from an investor’s perspective)

Reading guide

Robin notes that after a full day of pitches, investors may not remember every company’s details, but parts of a story can leave a strong impression. Learning to tell a memorable short story within limited time is a trainable skill. He cautions against overused stories even when true: like an entrance-exam essay grader reading one grandmother story after another, investors can become weary. Many PhD founders of biotech drug companies begin with a family member’s cancer inspiring them to develop treatments; repeated often enough, the story loses some emotional impact.

Key points

  • Parts of a pitch story can remain in investors’ memories.
  • Storytelling is a skill that can be trained.
  • Use stories repeated by many others cautiously.
  • An overused opening can lose its emotional impact on investors.
Read in English
Trends & Emerging TechnologyEnglish translation

Universities in an Era of Fewer Births: From Enrollment Numbers to Global Competitiveness

Robin’s commentary (as of October 2022, citing reported figures)

Reading guide

Robin cites reported figures: Taiwan would have just over 130,000 births in 2022, compared with nearly 270,000 university entrants in 2015 and roughly 240,000 in 2017. By 2040, the incoming cohort would fall to about 130,000; he argues that university numbers would have to fall by at least half relative to 2015. Universities should move beyond enrollment numbers toward developing each student’s global competitiveness and mobility. Just as investment should be assessed not only for profitability but for impact, greater impact can create greater future value.

Key points

  • Reported births of just over 130,000 point to a sharp decline in university entrants by 2040.
  • Universities should shift from enrollment numbers to developing competitiveness.
  • Develop students’ global mobility and influence.
  • Assess investment for impact, not only profitability.
Read in English
Management & OrganizationsEnglish translation

Humanities and Design as Keys to Future Success: A STEAM Book Introduction

Robin’s brief commentary plus a book introduction (title not specified in the post)

Reading guide

Robin argues that success in the future depends on a grounding in the humanities: understanding human nature, exploring motivations, and prompting behavioral change, alongside art and design that enrich the world beyond efficiency and functionality. He then shares a book introduction about STEAM—science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics—explaining how adding the arts emphasizes humanity, innovative thinking, and work across disciplines.

Key points

  • Robin: understanding human nature, art, and design are keys to success.
  • STEAM adds the arts to STEM.
  • The book introduction describes three qualities: humanist, innovator, and designer.
  • The cited acquisitions and counts of founders with design backgrounds have not been independently verified.
Read in English
Entrepreneurship & StrategyEnglish translation

Three Entrepreneurial Priorities and Robin’s Seven Points: Do Less, Focus, and Gather Resources

Excerpts from a talk by China Renaissance’s Bao Fan, plus Robin’s seven points

Reading guide

The post first summarizes Bao Fan’s three priorities: understand your target customers and market; recognize that the hardest part of entrepreneurship is doing less; and keep gathering resources—money carries resources behind it, which founders must actively uncover. Robin then adds seven points: know what you want and will sacrifice, understand customers, develop a feel for the market, simplify and focus, identify the core rather than aim for everything, invest time in depth, and gather resources including talent. His “guns in hand, follow me” metaphor describes a leader who can rally followers.

Key points

  • Understand customers and markets before starting a business.
  • The hardest part is knowing what not to do, rather than adding more.
  • Money carries resources behind it; actively gather them.
  • Robin’s seven points emphasize clear goals, customer understanding, focus, depth, and resources.
Read in English
Management & OrganizationsEnglish translation

Founding Teams Come in Many Forms: Respect One Another and Agree on the Rules First

Robin’s brief commentary plus excerpts from a talk by China Renaissance’s Bao Fan

Reading guide

Robin opens by saying founding teams can take many forms, but mutual respect is essential. Partners must agree on the rules beforehand and follow them. Bao Fan’s talk then explains that spouses, classmates, and equal partners can all succeed, provided responsibilities and decision-making are agreed in advance. The greatest risk is partners rejecting the original rules later. Core arrangements for sharing rewards and making decisions should not change lightly; procedures and regulations can evolve with company scale.

Key points

  • Team composition can vary; mutual respect is essential.
  • Agree on decision-making rules and follow them; shifting rules later threaten the venture.
  • Reward-sharing and decision-making are core arrangements that should not change lightly.
  • Processes and regulations evolve with company scale.
Read in English
Browse all 858 Chinese originals →